Diefenderfer v. Dept. Of Transportation
Diefenderfer v. Dept. Of Transportation
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit MARY ROSE DIEFENDERFER, Petitioner, ’ V. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTION, Respon.dent.
2011-3077 _ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protecti0n Board in case no. SE1221030298-B-3.
ON MOTION ORDER The parties jointly move to stay proceedings due to settlement eff0rts.
Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted to the extent that Mary R0se Diefenderfer’s brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order ;o1EFENoERFER v. TRANsPoR'rAT1oN 2 FoR THE COURT JUN 2 4 2011 131 Jan HOrba1y Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Mary Dryovage, Esq.
Jane W. Vanneman, Esq. F||_E[) U.8. COURT 0F APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL ClRCU|T JUN 24 2011 mumaam cum
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.