Intermec Technologies v. Palm
Intermec Technologies v. Palm
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb ~tate~ (!Court of §ppenl~ for tbe jfebernl (!Circuit INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PALM, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
2011-1296
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.
ON MOTION
ORDER Palm, Inc. moves for a 14-day extension of time, until August 4, 2011, to file its answering brief and Intermec Technologies Corp. moves for a 28-day extension of time, to file its reply brief after the date of service of Palm, Inc.' s brief.
Upon consideration thereof, INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES v. PALM INC 2 IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.
FOR THE COURT
JUL 1 9 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Carson P. Veach, Esq.
Robert T. Haslam, Esq.
FILED s21 u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 1 920\1 JAN.HORBAlY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.