Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner
Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CHET’S SHOES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SIDNEY KASTNER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ 2010-1555 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont in No. 08-CV-0197, Senior Judge J.
Garvan Murtha. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DONALD W. NILES, Niles Law Office, P.A., of Wadena, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee.
WALTER D. AMES, Law Office of Walter D. Ames, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellant. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 5, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.