Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Chet's Shoes, Inc. v. Kastner
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CHET’S SHOES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
SIDNEY KASTNER, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________
2010-1555 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Vermont in No. 08-CV-0197, Senior Judge J. Garvan Murtha. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
DONALD W. NILES, Niles Law Office, P.A., of Wadena, Minnesota, argued for plaintiff-appellee.
WALTER D. AMES, Law Office of Walter D. Ames, of McLean, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellant. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 5, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished