San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Oatey Co.
San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Oatey Co.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is 110r1p1'ecedentia1.
United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit SAN FRANCISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, ' V. OATEY COMPANY, Defendant-AppeZlee, AND `~ WOODSTREAM CORPORATION, Defen,dant-Appellee, ‘ AND CALICO BRANDS, INC., DYNA-GRO NUTRITION SOLUTIONS, L]XIT CORPORATION, MEAD WESTVACO CORPORATION, VITAMIN POWER INCORPORATED, AND 4-D DESIGN, INC., Defendants, AND UNITED STATES, Defendant.
2011-1338 Appeal from the United States District C0urt for the N0rthern DiStrict of Calif01'nia in case n0. 10-CV-2994, Judge Jeremy F0ge1.
SAN FRANCISCO TECH V. OATEY CO ON MOTION ` ORDER Upon consideration of San Francisc0 Techn01ogy Inc.’s motions to dismiss its appea1, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motions are granted (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FoR THE CoURT Date J an Horbaly C1erk ` cc: Georgia E. Yanchar, Esq.
Danie1 H. Fingerman, Esq.
Michae1J. Lyons, Esq. s19 issued AsAMandate: 1 1 j 1 lsi Jan Horba1}§ co di §§ 'Si°¢-h se- :a»'"§ D APPEALs FOR L ClRCUlT AUG 1 1 2011 .lAN |'|DRBALY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.