NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate5 Qtourt of ~peaI5 for tbe jfeberaI Qtircuit

IN RE REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP, PATENT LITIGATION

REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP AND REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC (DOING BUSINESS AS REMSTREAM), Plaintiffs·Appellants, v. CABLEVISION SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND CSC HOLDINGS, INC., Defendants·Appellees, AND ABC INC., CBS CORPORATION, AND NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., Defendants·Appellees, AND

CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA COMMUNICATIONS, LP, CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA, LP, CENTURY- TCI DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LLC, CENTURY- TCI HOLDINGS, LLC, PARNASSOS COMMUNICATIONS, LP, PARNASSOS DISTRIBUTION COMPANY I, LLC, PARNASSOS DISTRIBUTION COMPANY II, LLC, PARNASSOS HOLDINGS, LLC, PARNASSOS, LP, AND WESTERN NY CABLEVISION, LP, Defendants·Appellees, REMBRANDT TECH v. CABLEVISION 2

AND CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING LLC AND CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC., COM CAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST OF FLORIDA/PENNSYLVANIA, LP, COMCAST OF PENNSYLVANIA II, LP, AND COMCAST OF PLANO, LP, Defendants-Appellees, AND COXCOM, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY AND FOX ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND SHARP CORPORATION AND SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, AND TIME WARNER CABLE LLC, TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P., TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCEINEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, AND TIME WARNER NEW YORK CABLE LLC (KNOWN AS TIME WARNER NY CABLE LLC), 3 REMBRANDT TECH v. CABLEVISION

Defendants-Appellees, AND ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, ADELPHIA CONSOLIDATION LLC, AMBIT MICROSYSTEMS, INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., MOTOROLA, INC., NETGEAR, INC., SCIENTIFIC ATLANTA INC., AND THOMSON, INC., Defendants.

2012-1022

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 07-MD-1848, Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet.

ON MOTION

ORDER Upon consideration of the motions to reform the offi- cial caption, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted in part: The revised official caption is reflected above.

• The court generally retains parties that were in the district court action, even if those parties are not participating on appeal. The court removes the appellee designation from any party that is not participating. REMBRANDT TECH v. CABLEVISION 4 FOR THE COURT

DEC 12 2011 lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Paul B. Milcetic, Esq. Edward R. Reines, Esq. Jeremy S. Pitcock, Esq. John W. Shaw, Esq. . FILED Mark A. Perry, Esq. u.s.THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR FEDFRAl CIRCUIT Jeffrey H. Dean, Esq. Brian L. Ferrall, Esq. DEC ·12 ZOll Mitchell G. Stockwell, Esq. Jeffrey B. Plies, Esq. Richard H. Brown, III, Esq. JANHORBAlY CLERK David S. Benyacar, Esq. s20