Apple, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Apple, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. minim! games (£01m at Qppeals tm: the erheral Qtirmit APPLE, INC., Appellant, V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, V Intervenor. * 2011-1592 On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-717.
0N MOTION ORDER Eastman Kodak Company moves without opposition for leave to intervene. Separately, Apple Inc. moves for a 14-day extension of time, until Jan 17, 2012, to file its principal brief.
Upon consideration thereof,
APPLE INC v. ITC 2 IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.
FOR THE COURT 8 Isl Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk 1:/ 7 cc: Brian E. Ferguson, Esq.
Panyin A. Hughes, Esq.
Alan L. Barry, Esq.
FI D ' «.3. com OIFEPPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL ouncun DE_C 032011 JAN HDRBALY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.