In Re Apple Inc.
In Re Apple Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit IN RE APPLE INC., Pet£tioner.
Miscel1aneous Docket No. 103 On Petition for Writ of 1Vlandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case nos. 09-CV-0326, 10-CV-O248, and 09-CV-289, Judge Char1es Everingham IV.
ON PETITION ORDER App1e Inc. submits a petition for a writ of mandamus to direct the United States District Court for the Eastern District of TeXas to vacate its June 15, 2011 order deny- ing transfer and to direct transfer to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THATZ cc: Gregory Steven Arovas, Esq.
John Jeffrey Eichmann, Esq.
S Simp1eAir, Inc. is directed to respond no later than October 20, 2011.
F0R THE CoURT 5 /s/ Jan Horba1y Date J an Horbaly C1erk C1erk, United States District Court for the Eastern District Of Texas FlLE U.S. CDURT 0F AF'?PEALS FOR THE'FEDERAL C|RCU1T C-CT'U5 2011 JAN HDRBALY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.