NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

SEIKO EPSON CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

and

EPSON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. and EPSON AMERICA, INC., Counterclaim Defendants,

v.

CORETRONIC CORPORATION, Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee,

and

OPTOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

______________________

2011-1120 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Case No. 06-CV-6946, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

EDWARD P. WALKER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-appellant and counterclaim defendant appellees. With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF, JOHN W. O’MEARA and WILLIAM J. UTERMOHLEN.

STEVEN D. HEMMINGER, Alston and Bird, LLP, of Menlo Park, California, argued for defendant/counterclaimant- appellee and defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were YITAI HU and ELIZABETH H. RADER. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and DYK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 11, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk