Emcore Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Emcore Corp. v. International Trade Commission
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
EMCORE CORPORATION Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,
and
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES FIBER IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Intervenors. ____________________
2011-1069 ______________________
Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-669 ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
FREDERICK A. LORIG, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was SIDFORD LEWIS BROWN. Of counsel on the brief were LOUIS S. MASTRIANI and DANIEL F. SMITH, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, of Washington, DC. CLINT A. GERDINE, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel.
RICHARD S. FLORSHEIM, Foley & Lardner, LLP, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for intervenors. With him on the brief were CYNTHIA J. FRANECKI; JOHN C. VETTER, of Miami, Florida; GEORGE E. QUILLIN, of Washington, DC; and GINA A. BIBBY, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel were ROBERT F. KRAMER, Novak Duuce + Quigg, LLP, of San Francisco, California, and JEROLD I. SCHNEIFER, of West Palm Beach, Florida. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (BRYSON, MOORE, and REYNA , Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 14, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished