Emcore Corp. v. International Trade Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Emcore Corp. v. International Trade Commission

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

EMCORE CORPORATION Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee,

and

AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES FIBER IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD., and AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES, LTD., Intervenors. ____________________

2011-1069 ______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-669 ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

FREDERICK A. LORIG, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was SIDFORD LEWIS BROWN. Of counsel on the brief were LOUIS S. MASTRIANI and DANIEL F. SMITH, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, LLP, of Washington, DC. CLINT A. GERDINE, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC. With him on the brief were JAMES M. LYONS, General Counsel and ANDREA C. CASSON, Assistant General Counsel.

RICHARD S. FLORSHEIM, Foley & Lardner, LLP, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for intervenors. With him on the brief were CYNTHIA J. FRANECKI; JOHN C. VETTER, of Miami, Florida; GEORGE E. QUILLIN, of Washington, DC; and GINA A. BIBBY, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel were ROBERT F. KRAMER, Novak Duuce + Quigg, LLP, of San Francisco, California, and JEROLD I. SCHNEIFER, of West Palm Beach, Florida. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (BRYSON, MOORE, and REYNA , Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 14, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished