Berry v. Conyers
Berry v. Conyers
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
miniteb ~tates QCourt of §ppeaIs for tl)e jfeberaI QCircuit
JOHN BERRY, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, . Petitioner, v. RHONDA K. CONYERS AND DEVON HAUGHTON NORTHOVER, Respondents, AND
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
2011-3207
Petition for Review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in consolidated case nos. CH0752090925-R-l and AT0752100184-R-1.
ON MOTION
ORDER BERRY v. CONYERS 2
The National Treasury Employees Union moves without opposition to file a brief amicus curiae. Because the brief would be filed on consent, no motion is necessary. Fed. Cir. R. 29(c). Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied as unnecessary. The brief, if it has not already been filed, is due within 10 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT
DEC 21 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Abby C. Wright, Esq. FILED Andres M. Grajales, Esq. U.S. COURt OF APl>EALS fOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Jeffrey A. Gauger, Esq. Gregory J. O'Duden, Esq. OEC 21 2011 s24 JAN HORBAI.Y ClERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished