Hall v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Hall v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is n0np1'ecec1entia1.
United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit ROGER J. HALL, Plaintiff~Appellant, and na HALL & Ass0c1ATEs, Pz@zn¢z;,; V. BED BATH & BEYOND, INC., BED BATH & BEYOND PROCUREMENT CO. INC., AND FARLEY S. NACHEMIN, ' Defendants-Appellees, and WEST POINT HOME, INC., Defendant-Cr0ss Appellant.
2011-1165, -1235 Appeals from the United StateS DiStrict C0urt for the S0uthern DiStrict of New Y0rk in case n0. 10-CV-4391, Judge Alvin K. He11erStein.
ON MOTION HALL V. BED BATH 2 ORDER Upon consideration of the unopposed motion to reform the official caption, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted The revised official caption is reflected aboVe.
FoR THE CoURT 4 /s/ Jan Horba1y Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: Mitche1l C. She1oWitz, Esq.
Jordan A. Siga1e, Esq.
FlLED u.s. conn or APPaALs ron S21 ms season macon HAR114 2011 .|AH HDRBALY CLEH(
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.