Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit /

2011

2108 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinions from 2011.

  • Consolidated Edison Co. Of New York, Inc. v. Entergy Nuclear Indian Point 2, Llc. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Neutral Tandem, Inc. v. Peerless Network, Llc. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Sturdivant v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Sindram v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc. 410 F. App'x 336, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United States 410 F. App'x 337, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Cimline, Inc. v. Crafco, Inc. 413 F. App'x 240, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Spread Spectrum Screening Llc. v. Eastman Kodak Co. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Bosch v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • In Re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp. 413 F. App'x 247, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Gates v. Raytheon Co. 636 F.3d 1363, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Spansion, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COM'N 629 F.3d 1331, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Swidecki v. Department of Commerce 454 F. App'x 893, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Erickson v. United States Postal Service 636 F.3d 1353, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • The Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Thermo-Ply, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Espiritu v. Office of Personnel Management 410 F. App'x 335, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Mag Instrument, Inc. v. the Brinkman Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Aia Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux Intern. S/A 657 F.3d 1264, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Shockley v. Warden (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. International Trade Commission (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Burroughs v. Merit Systems Protection Board 410 F. App'x 334, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Chapman v. u.s. Postal Service (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Moore v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Cancer Research Technology Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. 637 F.3d 1293, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Cancer Research Technology Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc. 636 F.3d 1359, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Semiconductor Manufacturing International (Shanghai) Corp. v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. 453 F. App'x 976, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Lincoln Electric Co. v. International Trade Commission 410 F. App'x 332, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Acrow Corp. Of America v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Davis v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs 410 F. App'x 333, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramins & Plastics, Inc. 637 F.3d 1269, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Hologic, Inc. v. SenoRx, Inc. 639 F.3d 1329, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Sioux Honey Association v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Wrigley v. Cadbury Adams Usa, Llc. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Morris v. Dept. Of Housing and Urban Development (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Milburn v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • McConnell v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories 636 F.3d 1341, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Abb Inc. v. Cooper Industries, LLC (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Biopolymer Engineering, Inc. v. Immunocorp and Biotec Pharmacon Asa (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • A-Harmony NV, LLC v. WM Organic Growth, Inc. 456 F. App'x 889, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Darlington v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs 415 F. App'x 253, (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Bartex Research, Llc. v. Fedex Corp. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Cies Bisker, Llc. v. 3m Co. (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Biopolymer Engineering, Inc. V.immunocorp (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2011)
  • In Re Katz Interactive Processing Patent Litigation (Fed. Cir. 2011)
« Prev 1 … 34 35 36 37 38 … 43 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑