In Re Ditto
In Re Ditto
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Uliniteb fitatea (11101117th appeals {01‘th jfeheral Qtirtutt
IN RE FRANK ROBERT DITTO
2012-1 182 (Serial No. 09/276,1 37)
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Frank Robert Ditto, moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court treats Ditto’s submission as his response to the July 11, 2012 order disrnissing this appeal for failure to pay the filing fee.
Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
(2) The July 11, 2012 dismissal order is vacated, the appeal is reinstated, and the mandate is recalled.
IN RE DITTO 2
(3) The Director should calculate the due date for his brief from the date of filing of this order.
FOR THE COURT
JUL 2 6 2012 [5/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
cc: Frank Robert Ditto
Raymond T. Chen, Esq. 82 1 U.S. COUR'fIOIEEAlPJPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUL 2 6 ZUIZ JAN HUBBALY
‘ CLERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished