Lincoln Electric Co. v. International Trade Commission
Lincoln Electric Co. v. International Trade Commission
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY AND LINCOLN GLOBAL, INC., Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, and THE ESAB GROUP, INC., Intervenor, and SIDERGAS SPA, Intervenor. . ____________________ 2011-1087 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in No. 337-TA-686. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ TERRANCE J. WIKBERG, Perkins Coie, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were JAMES B. COUGHLAN and BRANDON M. WHITE; and DAN L. BAGATELL, of Phoenix, Arizona.
JIA CHEN, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were JAMES LYONS, General Counsel and MICHELLE KLANCNIK, Acting Assistant General Counsel.
BLAS P. ARROYO, Alston & Bird, LLP, of Charlotte, North Carolina, argued for all intervenors. With him on the brief for intervenor ESAB Group, Inc was MATTHEW SCOTT STEVENS; and STEPHEN B. MOSIER, NORMAN P. SOLOWAY and CLARK EDWARD PROFFITT, Hayes Soloway P.C., of Tucson, Arizona, for intervenor Sidergas SpA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 18, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.