Chu, Secretary of Energy v. Boeing
Chu, Secretary of Energy v. Boeing
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
miniteb ~tate9' (!Court of §ppeaI9' for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit STEVEN CHU, SECRETARY OF ENERGY, Appellant, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST OF ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION), Appellee. --------.--------------------------------------------- -----~------- THE BOEING COMPANY, (Successor-in-Interest of Rockwell International Corporation), Appellant, v. STEVEN CHU, SECRETARY OF ENERGY, Appellee.
2011·1304, -1317
Appeals from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in nos. 337, 338, 339, and 978, Administrative Judge R. Anthony McCann.
ENERGY v. BOEING CO 2 ON MOTION
ORDER The Boeing Company moves for a 60-day extension of time, until March 9, 2012, to file its reply brief.
Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.
FOR THE COURT
JAN 092012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbal1 Clerk cc: Domenique Kirchner, Esq FILED Richard J. Ney, Esq. u.s. COURT OF APPEAlS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT s21 JAN 0 9 2012 JAN HORBAlY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.