Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Bibow Industries
Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Bibow Industries
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb $tate~ <!Court of ~eal~ for tbe jfeberal <!Circuit
IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (DOING BUSINESS AS LENOX), Plaintiff-Appellee, v_ BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W. BIBOW, Defendants-Appellants.
2012-1079
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in case no. ll-CV-30023, Judge Douglas P . Woodlock.
ON MOTION
ORDER Bibow Industries, Inc. and Christopher W. Bibow move to withdraw their appeal. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: IRWIN INDUSTRIAL v. BIBOW INDUSTRIES 2 (1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT
JAN 092012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: John A. Burlingame, Esq. Edward P. Dutkiewicz, Esq. s21 N Issued As A Mandate: -----'J:.:.;Ac:..:.--'O:.....:9'--2=-:O_12 __ _
FILED u.s. COllRT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JAN 092012 JAN HOR8A1.V CLERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished