Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Bibow Industries
Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Bibow Industries
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb $tate~ <!Court of ~eal~ for tbe jfeberal <!Circuit IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (DOING BUSINESS AS LENOX), Plaintiff-Appellee, v_ BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W.
BIBOW, Defendants-Appellants.
2012-1079
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in case no. ll-CV-30023, Judge Douglas P . Woodlock.
ON MOTION
ORDER Bibow Industries, Inc. and Christopher W. Bibow move to withdraw their appeal.
Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: IRWIN INDUSTRIAL v. BIBOW INDUSTRIES 2 (1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted.
The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
JAN 092012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: John A. Burlingame, Esq.
Edward P. Dutkiewicz, Esq. s21 N Issued As A Mandate: -----'J:.:.;Ac:..:.--'O:.....:9'--2=-:O_12 __ _ FILED u.s. COllRT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JAN 092012 JAN HOR8A1.V CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.