NOTE: This order is n0nprecedentia1. United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit IN RE REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP, PATENT LITIGATION - REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LP AND REMBRANDT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC (DOING BUSINESS AS REMSTREAM), Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. cABLEv1s10N sYsTEMs c0RP0RAT101\`r mo csc H0L1)1NGS, 1NC., Defendants-Appellees, AND ABC INC., CBS CORPORATION, AND NBC UNIVERSAL, INC., Defendants-Appellees, AND CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA COMMUNICATIONS, LP, CENTURY-TCI CALIFORNIA, LP, CENTURY- TCI DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LLC, CENTURY~ TCI HOLDINGS, LLC, PARNASSOS COMMUNICATIONS, LP, PARNASSOS DISTRIBUTION COMPANY I, LLC, PARNASSOS DISTRIBUTION COMPAN`Y II, LLC, PARNASSOS

REMBRANDT TECH V. CABLEVISION 2 HOLDINGS, LLC, PARNASSOS, LP, AND WESTERN NY CABLEVISION, LP, Defendants-Appellees, AND CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING LLC AND CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendan,ts-Appellees, AND COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC., COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST OF _ __ FLORIDAlPENNSYLVANIA, LP, COMCAST OF PENNSYLVANIA II, LP, AND COMCAST .OF PLA_NO, LP, Defen,dants-Appellees, ° AND COXCOM, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY AND FOX ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., Defen,dants-Appellees, AND SHARP CORPORATION AND SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, AND

3 REMBR.ANDT TECH V. CABLEVISION TIME WARNER CABLE LLC, TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, L.P., TIME WARNER ENTERTAINMENT-ADVANCElNEWHOUSE PARTNERSHIP, AND TIME WARNER NEW YORK CABLE LLC (KNOWN AS TIME WARNER NY CABLE LLC), DefendantS-Appellees, AND ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, ADELPHIA CONSOLIDATION LLC, AMBIT MICROSYSTEMS, INC., CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., MOTOROLA, INC., NETGEAR, INC., SCIENTIFIC ATLANTA INC., AND THOMSON, INC., ' Defendants. 2012-1022 Appea1 from the United States District C0urt for the District of De1aWare in case n0. 07-MD-1848, Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet. ON MOTION ORDER The appellees move for a 60-day extension of time, until March 26, 2012, to file their response briefs. Rem- brandt Techno1ogies, LP, et a1. oppose. Upon consideration thereof

REM_BRANDT TECH v. CABLEVISION IT ls ORDERE1) THAT: The motion is granted JAN 1 8 2012 Date cc: Paul B. MiIcetic, Esq Edward R. Reines, Esq. Jeremy S. Pitc0ck, Esq. John W. Shaw, Esq. Mark A. Perry, Esq. Jeff`rey H. Dean, Esq. Brian L. Ferra11, Esq. Mitchell G. StockweIl, Esq. Jeffrey B. Plies, Esq. Richard H. Brown, III, Esq. David S. Benyacar, Esq. s21 4 FoR THE CoURT /S/ Jan Horbal§; J an Horba1y C1erk F D U.S. COURT E||FF\PPEAlS FOB TI'|E FEDEHAL ClRCU¥T JAN-10ZU12 JAN HORBAl.Y CLERK