Rates Technology v. Mediatrix Telecom
Rates Technology v. Mediatrix Telecom
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
mtniteb ~tate5 ([ourt of §ppeaI5 for !be jfeberaI ([irruit
RATES TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, AND JAMES B. HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEDIATRIX TELECOM, INC. AND MEDIA5 CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees, AND BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP, Defendant.
2011-1384
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in case no. 05-CV-2755, Judge Joanna Seybert.
ON MOTION
ORDER
1 - - - - - - ----------- RATES TECH v. MEDIATRIX TELECOM 2
James B. Hicks moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of time, until February 20,2012, to file his reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. No further extensions should be anticipated. FOR THE COURT
JAN 1-, 2012 lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: James B. Hicks, Esq. Ethan Horwitz, Esq. FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEBERAl CIRCUIT s21 JAN 1 72012 JAN HORBALY CLERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished