NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

mnfteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~ for tbe jfeberaI ~frtuft

PERPETUA SAOY-CINCO, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

2012-7027

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 10-1902, Judge Kenneth B. Kramer.

ON MOTION

ORDER Upon review of this recently docketed appeal, it ap- pears that Perpetua Saoy-Cinco's appeal was not timely filed. On September 20, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered judgment in Saoy- Cinco's case. The court received Saoy-Cinco's notice of appeal on November 22, 2011, 63 days after the date of judgment. SAOY-CINCO v. DVA 2 To be timely, a notice of appeal must be received by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims within 60 days of the entry of judgment. See 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) Saoy-Cinco is directed to show cause, within 60 days of the date of filing of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed as untimely. The Secretary of Veterans Affairs may also respond within that time. (2) The briefing schedule is stayed. FOR THE COURT

JAN 1 -, 2012 lsI Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly. Clerk cc: Perpetua Saoy-Cinco Tara K. Hogan, Esq. FILED u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR s19 THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JAN 172012 JANHORBALY ClERK