Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PALM, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2011-1296 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L. Robinson. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

CARSON P. VEACH, Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID S. BECKER and JACOB D. KOERING.

ROBERT T. HASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL M. MARKMAN and ROBERT WILLIAMS of San Francisco, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 18, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished