Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.
Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PALM, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________
2011-1296 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L. Robinson. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
CARSON P. VEACH, Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID S. BECKER and JACOB D. KOERING.
ROBERT T. HASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL M. MARKMAN and ROBERT WILLIAMS of San Francisco, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 18, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished