U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2012

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided January 18, 2012

Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PALM, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ 2011-1296 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L.

Robinson. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CARSON P. VEACH, Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID S. BECKER and JACOB D. KOERING.

ROBERT T. HASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL M.

MARKMAN and ROBERT WILLIAMS of San Francisco, California. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 18, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.