Nolen v. Lufkin Indus.
Nolen v. Lufkin Indus.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteh ~tates <!Court of §ppeaIs for tbe jfeheraI <!Cirruit KEN NOLEN, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, AND MATTICKS & EASTHAM, LLP, Movant-Cross Appellant, AND SAM G. GIBBS, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, AND COTTON, BLEDSOE, TIGHE & DAWSON, P.C., Movant-Cross Appellant, v. LUFKIN INDUSTRIES, INC., GARY BUSH AND ANDREWS KURTH, LLP, Defendants-Appellants.
2011-1251, -1265, -1278, -1279, -1499, -1500, -1522, -1523
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in case no. 1O-CV-0048, Senior Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth.
NOLEN v. LUFKIN INDUSTRIES 2 ORDER Upon review of these appeals, the appeals are consoli- dated.
IT IS ORDERED THAT: The revised official caption is reflected above.
FOR THE COURT
FEB 01 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Kenneth E. Carroll, Esq. rilED Kenneth R. Matticks, Esq. u.s. COURT OF APPEALS FOR Richard D. Milvenan, Esq. THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Charles C. Aycock, Esq. FEB 01 2012 s21 JAN HORBALY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.