Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.
Paid Search Engine Tools, LLC v. Yahoo! Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PAID SEARCH ENGINE TOOLS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YAHOO! INC., Defendant-Appellee, and GOOGLE INC., Defendant-Appellee, and MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.
____________________ 2011-1281 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 07-CV-0403, Judge David J. Folsom. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ WARREN JEFFREY SEFTON, Keating Muething & Klekamp, PLL, of Cincinnati, Ohio, argued for plaintiff- appellant. With him on the brief was J. ROBERT CHAMBERS, Wood Herron & Evans, LLP, of Cincinnati, Ohio. DAVID A. PERLSON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for all defendants-appellees. With him on the brief for defendant-appellee Google Inc., were CHARLES K.
VERHOEVEN, EMILY C. O’BRIEN and ANTONIO R. SISTOS.
On the brief for defendant-appellee Yahoo! Inc., were DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman LLP, of San Francisco, California; and EDWARD R. REINES, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Redwood Shores, California. On the brief for defendant-appellee Microsoft Corp., were CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR. and RICHARD A.
CEDEROTH, Sidley Austin LLP, of Chicago, Illinois; and BRYAN K. ANDERSON, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel was TACY F. FLINT ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.