Acharya v. Hauser
Acharya v. Hauser
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
BARUN ACHARYA AND XINGEN DONG, Appellants,
v.
RAYMOND HAUSER AND LONNIE E. HOLDER, Appellees. ____________________
2011-1452 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Interference No. 105,750. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JAY R. CAMPBELL, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were DON W. BULSON, TODD R. TUCKER, KYLE B. FLEMING and NICHOLAS J. GINGO.
THOMAS C. MCDONOUGH, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was LAWRENCE E. JAMES, JR. Of counsel on the brief were CHARLES L. GHOLZ and W. TODD BAKER, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LINN, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished