Acharya v. Hauser

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Acharya v. Hauser

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

BARUN ACHARYA AND XINGEN DONG, Appellants,

v.

RAYMOND HAUSER AND LONNIE E. HOLDER, Appellees. ____________________

2011-1452 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Interference No. 105,750. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

JAY R. CAMPBELL, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were DON W. BULSON, TODD R. TUCKER, KYLE B. FLEMING and NICHOLAS J. GINGO.

THOMAS C. MCDONOUGH, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was LAWRENCE E. JAMES, JR. Of counsel on the brief were CHARLES L. GHOLZ and W. TODD BAKER, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LINN, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Reference

Status
Unpublished