Acharya v. Hauser
Acharya v. Hauser
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BARUN ACHARYA AND XINGEN DONG, Appellants, v. RAYMOND HAUSER AND LONNIE E. HOLDER, Appellees. ____________________ 2011-1452 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Interference No. 105,750. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAY R. CAMPBELL, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were DON W. BULSON, TODD R. TUCKER, KYLE B. FLEMING and NICHOLAS J. GINGO.
THOMAS C. MCDONOUGH, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellees. With him on the brief was LAWRENCE E. JAMES, JR. Of counsel on the brief were CHARLES L. GHOLZ and W. TODD BAKER, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LINN, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.