NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the FederaI Circuit IN RE HISAMITSU CO., INC., Appellant. ' 2012-1025 (Reexamination No. 90/O08,491) Appeal from the United States Patent and 'l‘rademark OfE1ce, B0ard of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ON MOTION Before LoUR1E, PRosT, and Mo0RE, Circuit Judges. MO0RE, Circu,it Judge. ORDER The appellants move without opposition to reform the caption. The parties also jointly move to remand for further proceedings The parties’ motion states that the appellant filed a petition seeking review by the Chief Ad1ninistrative Patent Judge, but filed its notice of appeal prior to the Chief Judge being able to act on the petition. The court agrees with the parties that remand is appropriate to allow the Chief Judge to act on the petition.

IN RE HISAMITSU Accordingly, IT ls 0RDERED THAT: 2 (1) The motion to reform the caption is granted The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) The motion to remand for further proceedings is granted. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs. FoR THE CoUR'r FEB 95 mg 151 Jan H01~ba1y Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Ronald C. Harris, Jr., Esq. _ Ray1:nond T. Chen, Esq. FILED u.s. count uF APPEALs FOB 1'HEFEnEnA1.c1nculT FEB U 5 2012 JAN HOBBALV s19 C|_EHK Issued As A Mandate: FEB 0 6