In Re Printless Previews
In Re Printless Previews
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE PRINTLESS PREVIEWS,
____________________ 2011-1273 (Reexamination Nos. 90/007996 and 90/009,092) ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOHN JEFFREY EICHMANN, Dovel & Luner, LLP, of Santa Monica, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was GREGORY S. DOVEL.
BENJAMIN D.M. WOOD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and KRISTI L.R. SAWERT, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 8, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.