In Re Halsey
In Re Halsey
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE EUGENE HALSEY, IV AND CATHERINE A. GETZ . ____________________ 2011-1435 (Serial No. 10/744,522) ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GOKALP BAYRAMOGLU, Law Office of Gokalp Bayramoglu, of Holland, Michigan, argued for appellant.
LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and BENJAMIN D.M. WOOD, Associate Solicitor.
______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LINN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.