In Re Halsey
In Re Halsey
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE EUGENE HALSEY, IV AND CATHERINE A. GETZ
. ____________________
2011-1435 (Serial No. 10/744,522)
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
GOKALP BAYRAMOGLU, Law Office of Gokalp Bayramoglu, of Holland, Michigan, argued for appellant.
LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and BENJAMIN D.M. WOOD, Associate Solicitor.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LINN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 13, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished