Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.
Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit LIGHTING BALLAST CONTROL LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, ' _ V. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, _ Defendant, A.ND .
UNIVERSAL LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
2012-1014 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the N01'thern District of Texas in case n0. 09-CV-0029, Judge Reed O’C0nnor.
ON MOTION _ ORDER Universa1 Lighting Techno10gieS, Inc. moves without opposition for a 24-day extension of time from the date of LIGHTING BALLAST V. PHILIPS ELECTRON 2 service of Lighting Ba11ast Control LLC’s responsive brief to file its reply brief.
Upon consideration thereof IT ls OR1)EREo THAT: The motion is granted Universa1 Lighting Techno1o- gies, Inc.’s reply brief is due 24 days from the date of service of Lighting Ba11ast Control LLC’s responsive brief.
FoR THE CoURT HAR 2 1 2012 /s/ J an Horba1y Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Jonathan T. Suder, Esq.
Steven J. Routh, Esq. ` FlLED us.c0um0FAPPaALs ron me FEnEnAL macon MAR 2 1 -2012 .lAN HORBA|.Y . CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.