U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2012

Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.

Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided March 21, 2012

Lighting Ballast Control LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit LIGHTING BALLAST CONTROL LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, ' _ V. PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, _ Defendant, A.ND .

UNIVERSAL LIGHTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1014 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the N01'thern District of Texas in case n0. 09-CV-0029, Judge Reed O’C0nnor.

ON MOTION _ ORDER Universa1 Lighting Techno10gieS, Inc. moves without opposition for a 24-day extension of time from the date of LIGHTING BALLAST V. PHILIPS ELECTRON 2 service of Lighting Ba11ast Control LLC’s responsive brief to file its reply brief.

Upon consideration thereof IT ls OR1)EREo THAT: The motion is granted Universa1 Lighting Techno1o- gies, Inc.’s reply brief is due 24 days from the date of service of Lighting Ba11ast Control LLC’s responsive brief.

FoR THE CoURT HAR 2 1 2012 /s/ J an Horba1y Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Jonathan T. Suder, Esq.

Steven J. Routh, Esq. ` FlLED us.c0um0FAPPaALs ron me FEnEnAL macon MAR 2 1 -2012 .lAN HORBA|.Y . CLERK

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.