NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1.

United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit BROADCOM CORPORATION,' Plaintiff-Appellee, V. EMULEX CORPORATION, Defendcmt~Appellant.

2012-1309 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the Ce11tra1 District of Ca1ifornia in case no. 09-CV-1058, Judge James V. Se1na. ` oN MoTIoN ORDER Emulex C0rporation submits a motion for a stay of the district court's permanent injunction, pending appea1.

Emulex also moves to expedite briefing and to expedite the appellees response to the motion for a stay. Broad- com Corporation opposes expedited briefing Upon consideration thereof IT IS ORDERED THATZ BROADCOM V. EM`U`LEX 2 (1) Broadcom Corporation's response to the motion for a stay is due no later than May 3, 2012. The motion to expedite the response to the motion for a stay is moot. (2) The motion to expedite the briefing schedule is denied. Emulex may of course file its briefs and the joint appendix early, without order of the court, and thereby significantly expedite the case. Emulex has not shown that Broadcom Corporation's time to file its brief should be shortened, although Broadcom should not anticipate any extensions of time to Ele its brief. a FoR THE CoURT APR 2 6 2012 /s/ J an Horbaly ` Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Juanita R. Brooks, Esq. .

William F. Lee, Esq. s8 ,FBLED us coun FAPz=eALs ron THE *'~’EDERAL C|HCU|T APR 2 32012 ammann |1EBK