NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY AND ARUP K. SENGUPTA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, V. BRO-TECH CORPORATION (DOING BUSINESS AS THE PUROLITE COMPANY), Defendant-Appellan.t.

2012-1178 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in case n0. 09~CV-2381, Senior Judge John W. Lungstru1n.

ON MOTION Before RADER, Chief Judge.

0 R D E R Bio-Tech Corpo1'ation moves to stay the briefing schedule pending entry of final judgment by the district court Layne Christensen Company et al oppose and move to dismiss this appea1. Bio-Tech replies LAYNE CHRISTENSEN co v. BRO-TECH 2 Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORI)ERED THAT: (1) Bio-Tech’s motion is granted. Bi0-Tech is directed to inform this court within 14 days from the date of entry of final judgment by the district court. (2) Layne’s motion to dismiss is denied FOR THE CoUR'r lsi J an Horba1y Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: Patrick D. Kuehl, Jr., Esq.

David R. Francescani, Esq. __ F|LED S19 U.S. CUUHT 0F AFPEALS FUR THE FE'JEHAL CIRCU|T APR 3UZl]1Z JAN HORBAL¥ CLEHK