NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE MIKE O’DONNELL and ANDREW CAMERON ____________________ 2011-1610 (Serial No. 09/245,798) ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ TIMOTHY E. SIEGEL, Timothy E. Siegel Patent Law, PLLC, of Bellevue, Washington, argued for appellants.

FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and JOSEPH G.

PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor.

______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 11, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk