Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc.
Voter Verified, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit VOTER VERIFIED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellcznt, V. PREMIER ELECTION SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant, AND DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
201]-1553, 2012-1017 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in case no. 09-CV-1968, Senior Judge Patricia C. Fawsett.
VOTER VERIFIED, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, V. ELE CTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. voTER VERIFIED v_ PREMIER ELECTION 2 2011-1559, 2012-1016 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in case n0. 09-CV-1969, Senior Judge Patricia C. Fawsett.
ON MOTION Before NEWMAN, circuit Judge.
0 R D E R Voter Verified, Inc. moves to strike sections of Pre- mier Election Solutions, lnc. and Election Systems & Software, Inc.’s reply briefs. Premier and Election oppose.
Voter Verified has not shown that the reply briefs are out of compliance with Federal Rule of Appellate Proce- dure 28.1(0)(4) ('requiring reply briefs to be "limited to the issues presented by the cross-appeal.") Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT; (1) The motions are denied (2) The official caption in 2011-1559 and 2012-1016 is reflected above.
FoR THE CoURT HAY 3 1 2812 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Robert M. Evans, Jr., Esq.
Anthony l. Provitola, Esq. F|LED "“'*1%%“¢%§’§»&"&§%%%€ HAY 31 ZUTL JANHBRBAL¥ CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.