Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

SYNQOR, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

V.

ARTESYN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ASTEC AMERICA, INC., Defendants-Appellants,

AND

BEL FUSE, INC., Defendant-Appellant,

AND

DELTA ELECTRON`ICS, INC., DELTA PRODUCTS CORP., AND POWER-ONE, INC., Defendants~Appellants,

AND

MURATA ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA, INC., MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., AND MURATA POWER SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants-Appellants,

AND

CHEROKEE INTERNATIONAL CORP. AND LINEAGE POWER CORP.,

Defendants.

SYNQOR V. ARTESYN TECH 2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas in case no. 07-CV-O497, Judge T. John Ward.

2011-1191, -1192, -1194, 2012-1070, -1071, -1072

ON MOTION

ORDER

The Bel Fuse, lnc. moves to withdraw Kenneth P.

Kula as counsel. Artesyn Technologies, lnc. et al. (Arte- syn) move for a 228-day extension of time, until June 28, 2012, to file their reply briefs. SynQor, Inc. consents to a 14-day extension of time, but otherwise opposed the motion. Artesyn replies.

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to withdraw counsel is granted.

(2) The motion for an extension of time is granted to

the extent that Artesyn is granted a 17-day extension of time to file their reply briefs. No more extensions

CC§

FoR THE CoURT 0 4 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk

Donald R. Dunner, Esq. Constantine L. Tre1a, Jr., Esq. Alan D. Smith, Esq.

F|LED U.s. cnun‘r or APPEALS Fon THE FE¢JEHAL c:nculi

JUN 04 2012

JAN HURBALY CLEHK

519

William F. Lee, Esq. Andrew J. Pincus, Esq.

SYNQOR v . ARTESYN TECH

Reference

Status
Unpublished