In Re Mainline Corporate Holdings, Ltd.
In Re Mainline Corporate Holdings, Ltd.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
IN RE MAINLINE CORPORATE HOLDINGS, LIMITED
____________________ 2011-1609 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in No. 90/010,191. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MICHAEL N. RADER, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C., of Boston, Massachusetts. argued for appellant. With him on the brief was CHELSEA A. LOUGHRAN.
FRANCES M. LYNCH. Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor and William LaMarca, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 14, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.