Capital MacHine Co., Inc. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.
Capital MacHine Co., Inc. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC. AND INDIANA FORGE, LLC, Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, AND WILLIAM L. KOSS, Coumferclaim Defendant, V. MILLER VENEERS, INC., Defendant/ Cou,nterclaimant~Appellee, AND THOMAS A. MILLER, BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO, ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants-Appellees.
2012-1288 Appeal from the United States District C0urt for the Southern District of Indiana in case no. 09-CV-0'702, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.
CAPITAL MACH`[NE V. MILLER VEN.EERS 2 ON MOTION ORDER Capital Mach_ine Company, Inc. and Indiana Forge, LLC (Capita] Machine) move for leave to file a corresponding brief pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 32(e).
Mi]ler Veneers et a1. respond. Capital Machine replies Mi]ler Veneers moves for leave to file a surreply, with surreply attached.
Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted. Both parties Inay, if they choose, file corresponding briefs pursuant to Fed. Cir. Ru1e 32(e).
FoR THE CoURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk . - - Fl D cc. Michael A. Swift, Esq. u_s_ggug~rgp \=FEALS FOH Paul B. Overhauser, Esq. THE FEDERMC'RCH'T James I... McNeely, Esq. JUN ’] 4 2[]12 JANHc)naALY GLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.