Capital MacHine Co., Inc. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Capital MacHine Co., Inc. v. Miller Veneers, Inc.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

CAPITAL MACHINE COMPANY, INC. AND INDIANA FORGE, LLC, Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,

AND

WILLIAM L. KOSS, Coumferclaim Defendant,

V.

MILLER VENEERS, INC., Defendant/ Cou,nterclaimant~Appellee,

AND THOMAS A. MILLER, BENJAMIN R. MILLER, SALLY M. SANDO, ROBERT D. BRAND, INDIANAPOLIS VENEER WORKS, LLC, EGENOLF MACHINE, INC., AND MERRITT PLYWOOD MACHINERY, INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants-Appellees.

2012-1288

Appeal from the United States District C0urt for the Southern District of Indiana in case no. 09-CV-0'702, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson.

CAPITAL MACH`[NE V. MILLER VEN.EERS 2

ON MOTION

ORDER

Capital Mach_ine Company, Inc. and Indiana Forge, LLC (Capita] Machine) move for leave to file a corresponding brief pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 32(e). Mi]ler Veneers et a1. respond. Capital Machine replies Mi]ler Veneers moves for leave to file a surreply, with surreply attached.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions are granted. Both parties Inay, if they choose, file corresponding briefs pursuant to Fed. Cir. Ru1e 32(e).

FoR THE CoURT

4 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk . - - Fl D cc. Michael A. Swift, Esq. u_s_ggug~rgp \=FEALS FOH Paul B. Overhauser, Esq. THE FEDERMC'RCH'T James I... McNeely, Esq. JUN ’] 4 2[]12

324 JANHc)naALY GLERK

Reference

Status
Unpublished