Higgins v. Office of Personnel Management
Higgins v. Office of Personnel Management
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit PURLENE HIGGINS, Petition,er, V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.
2012-3104 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. SFO831110572-l-1.
ON MOTION ORDER Purlene Higgins moves for a 90-day extension of time until August 27, 2012, to find an attorney and file her brief. The government responds with alternative requests to suspend briefing and extend the time to file its brief.
Up0n consideration thereof, I'r Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion for an extension of time is granted Ms. Higgins must file her brief by August 27 , 2012.
HIGGINS V. OPM (2) The request to suspend briefing is denied. The governrnent’s response brief will be calculated from the date of filing of Ms. Higgins’ opening brief.
JUN 1 8 2012 Date cc: Purlene Higgins Kenneth S. Kessler, Esq. s24 FoR THE CoURT /s! J an Horbaly J an Horbaly Clerk LED “~Ste‘a“.;§é;ttsts§°“ .JUN l 5 'ZUYZ JAN HURBAL\' CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.