Timebase Pty Ltd. v. The Thomson Corp.
Timebase Pty Ltd. v. The Thomson Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
TIMEBASE PTY LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
THE THOMSON CORPORATION, WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, and WEST SERVICES, INC., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________
2012-1082 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in Case No. 07-CV-1687, Judge Joan N. Ericksen. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JOSEPH N. HOSTENY, Niro, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argrued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were ARTHUR A. GASEY and ROBERT A. CONLEY.
DAVID J.F. GROSS, Faegre Baker Daniels, LLP, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were CALVIN L. LITSEY, MARY V. SOOTER and KEVIN P. WAGNER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 19, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished