Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
MARIE C. CONFORTO, Petitioner,
V.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
2012~3119
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Pr0tection Board in case no. SF0752120154-I-1.
ON MOTION
ORDER
The Department of the Navy (Navy) moves to reform the caption to name the Merit Systems Pr0tecti0n Board as the resp0ndent.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. In this case, the B0ard dismissed the appeal for lack of
MARIE CONFORTO V. NAVY
jurisdiction Thus, the B0ard is the proper respondent in
this petition for review. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THATZ
The motion to reform the official caption is granted The revised official caption is reflected above.
JUN 20 2012 Date
co: Scott L. Zielinski, Esq.
Katy M. Barte1ma, Esq.
Katherine Smith, Esq. s21
FOR THE CoURT
/s/ Jan Horbai_\[ J an Horbaly
C1erk
.F LED u.s.coun'r BF APPEA1s son mEFEnEsALcnzcun
JUN 20 2[]12 JAN HOHBALY CI.ERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished