Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Conforto v. Merit Systems Protection Board
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit MARIE C. CONFORTO, Petitioner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.
2012~3119 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Pr0tection Board in case no. SF0752120154-I-1.
ON MOTION ORDER The Department of the Navy (Navy) moves to reform the caption to name the Merit Systems Pr0tecti0n Board as the resp0ndent.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. In this case, the B0ard dismissed the appeal for lack of
MARIE CONFORTO V. NAVY jurisdiction Thus, the B0ard is the proper respondent in this petition for review.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THATZ The motion to reform the official caption is granted The revised official caption is reflected above.
JUN 20 2012 Date co: Scott L. Zielinski, Esq.
Katy M. Barte1ma, Esq.
Katherine Smith, Esq. s21 FOR THE CoURT /s/ Jan Horbai_\[ J an Horbaly C1erk .F LED u.s.coun'r BF APPEA1s son mEFEnEsALcnzcun JUN 20 2[]12 JAN HOHBALY CI.ERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.