Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Apeldyn Corp. v. Au Optronics Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION ANI) AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA," Defendants-Appellees,

AND

CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPOl-{ATION AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendcznts-Appellees,

AND

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.

2012-1172

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case n0. 08-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

APELDYN CORP V. AU OPTRON.[CS 2

APELDYN CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

V.

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AND AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, Defendcznts-Appellees,

AND

CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS USA INC., Defendants-Appellees,

AND

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. AND SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants.

2012-1173

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. (}8-CV-0568, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Apeldyn Corporation ("Apeldyn") m0ves, unopp0sed, for an extension of tirne. Specifically, Apeldyn requests that its deadline to designate materials for the appendix and to file its statement of issues be extended to August 6, 2012; that its deadline to file its certificate of compliance

3 APELDYN CORP V. AU OPTRONICS

with Federal Circuit Rule 11(d) be extended to Septem- ber 7, 2012; and that its deadline to file its opening brief be extended to September 21, 2012. Apeldyn also moves to withdraw its appeal from the district court order dis- qualifying McKenna Long & Aldridge ("l\/IcKenna Long") from representing Apeldyn against Samsung, appeal 2012-11'73. McKenna Long moves to withdraw as counsel for Apeldyn.

Upon consideration thereof, lT IS ORDERED THATI

(1) Apeldyn’s motion for an extension of time is granted

(2) Apeldyn’s motion to withdraw appeal 2012-1173 is granted Appeal 2012-1173 is dismissed. Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1173. The revised official caption in 2012-1172 is reflected above.

(3) McKenna Long’s motion to withdraw as counsel for Apeldyn is granted.

(4) All other pending motions are denied as moot.

FoR THE CoURT

/s/ Jan Horbal Date J an Horbaly Clerk

cc: Gaspare J. Bono, Esq.

Don H. Marmaduke, Esq. F"_EPP

Terrence Duane Garnett, Esq. U.S.TE|%\%|§BE§AL CHI-imm . Donald R. McPhail, Esq. a , _,

N@ii Phiiiip siroca, Esq. JUL 06 ¢W

JAN HOBBA|.Y CLERK

APELDYN CORP V. AU OPTRONICS 4 s25

issUED As A MANDATE cas no 2012-1173 only); JUL 0 5 2513

Reference

Status
Unpublished