Layne Christiansen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.
Layne Christiansen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY ~ AND ARUP K. SENGUPTA, ` Plaintiffs-Appellees,
V.
BRO-TECH CORPORATION (DOING BUSINESS AS THE PUROLITE COMPANY), Defendant-Appellant.
2012-1178
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in case no. 09-CV-2381, Senior Judge John W. Lungstrum.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of Bro-Tech Corporation’s notifi» cation that the district court amended its final judgment on June 29, 2012,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
LAYNE CHRISTENSEN CO v. BRO-TECH 2 (1) The stay of the briefing schedule is lifted.
(2) Bro-Tech Corporation’s opening brief is due no later than 60 days following the date of this order.
FoR THE CoURT JuL 3 2012 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y C1erk f cc: Patrick D. Kuehl, Jr., Esq. David R. Francescani, Esq. FOB 825 "‘s'\?q?a\i=entnat c\ncurr JUL 30 2012
` JAN HOHBA[¥ C|.ERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished