Layne Christiansen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Layne Christiansen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY ~ AND ARUP K. SENGUPTA, ` Plaintiffs-Appellees,

V.

BRO-TECH CORPORATION (DOING BUSINESS AS THE PUROLITE COMPANY), Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1178

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in case no. 09-CV-2381, Senior Judge John W. Lungstrum.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of Bro-Tech Corporation’s notifi» cation that the district court amended its final judgment on June 29, 2012,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

LAYNE CHRISTENSEN CO v. BRO-TECH 2 (1) The stay of the briefing schedule is lifted.

(2) Bro-Tech Corporation’s opening brief is due no later than 60 days following the date of this order.

FoR THE CoURT JuL 3 2012 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y C1erk f cc: Patrick D. Kuehl, Jr., Esq. David R. Francescani, Esq. FOB 825 "‘s'\?q?a\i=entnat c\ncurr JUL 30 2012

` JAN HOHBA[¥ C|.ERK

Reference

Status
Unpublished