Layne Christiansen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.
Layne Christiansen Co. v. Bro-Tech Corp.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY ~ AND ARUP K. SENGUPTA, ` Plaintiffs-Appellees, V. BRO-TECH CORPORATION (DOING BUSINESS AS THE PUROLITE COMPANY), Defendant-Appellant.
2012-1178 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in case no. 09-CV-2381, Senior Judge John W. Lungstrum.
ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Bro-Tech Corporation’s notifi» cation that the district court amended its final judgment on June 29, 2012, IT Is ORDERED THAT: LAYNE CHRISTENSEN CO v. BRO-TECH 2 (1) The stay of the briefing schedule is lifted. (2) Bro-Tech Corporation’s opening brief is due no later than 60 days following the date of this order.
FoR THE CoURT JuL 3 2012 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horba1y C1erk f cc: Patrick D. Kuehl, Jr., Esq.
David R. Francescani, Esq.
FOB "‘s'\?q?a\i=entnat c\ncurr JUL 30 2012 ` JAN HOHBA[¥ C|.ERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.