NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit TAURUS IP, LLC (NOW KNOWN AS MANUFACTURING SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC), ` Plaintiff/T?zird Party Defen,dant- Appellant, AND ORION IP, LLC (NOW KNOWN AS CLEAR W'ITH COMPUTERS LLC) AND ERICH SPANGENBERG, Third Party Defendant-Appellants, V. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, CHRYSLER FINANCIAL, LLC, AND DAIMLERCHRYSLER COMPANY, LLC, Defendants, AND CHRYSLER HOLDING, LLC, Defendant, AND MERCEDES-BENZ USA, INC., `AND CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants.

TAURUS IP V. DAIMLERCHRYSLER 2008-1462,-1463, -1464, 1465 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in case n0. 07-CV-158, Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb.

TAURUS IP, LLC (NOW KNOWN AS MANUFACTURING SYSTEM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC), Plaintiff-Appellant, V. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, _ Defendant-Cross Appellant, AND REEBOK INTERNA'I`IONAL, LTD., Defenclant, AND POLO RALPH LAUREN CORP., Defendant, AND MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendant.

2008-1474, - 1477 TAURUS IP V. DA.lMLERCI-IRYSLER Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in case no. 07-CV-477, Chief Judge Barbara B. Crabb.

ON MOTION ORDER Taurus IP, LLC moves without opposition to dismiss its appeal as to DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Chrysler Financial, LLC, Daimler Chrysler Company, LLC, and Chrysler Holding, LLC. Taurus also moves without opposition to substitute Chrysler Group LLC for Old Carco Liquidation Trust, lift the stay of prooeedings, and set a briefing schedule.

Because this court does not dismiss a portion of a pending appeal the court will instead revise`the official caption to indicate that DaimlerChrysler et al. are not appellees- The court also deems it the better course for Taurus to re-file its initial brief removing the arguments relating to the summary judgment of non-infringement in favor of Old Carco.

Accordingly, lT lS ORDERED THATZ (1) The motions are granted to the extent that the motion for substitution, the motion to lift the stay of proceedings, and the motion to set the briefing schedule are granted. (2) Taurus is directed to file a corrected initial brief within 14 days from the date of filing of this order. Tau- rus’ and Orion-Spangenberg’s response/reply briefs are due within 35 days from the date of filing of this order.

Chrysler Group LLC and Mercedes-Benz USA, Inc.’s reply briefs are due within 35 days of service of the re~ TAURUS IP V. DAIMLERCHRYSLER

sponse/reply briefs. Hyundai Motor America’s reply brief is due within 35 days from the date of service of Taurus’s response/reply brief. (3) The revised official caption is reflected above.

AUG 06 2012 Date cc: Mitchell G. Stockwell, Esq.

Michael Edwin Jones, Esq.

Elizabeth A. Wiley, Esq.

Jon E. Wright, Esq.

Gene C. Schaerr, Esq. s19 FOR THE COURT /s/ J an Horbaly J an Horbaly Clerk F|LED m oF APPEALS l=on u'_s'tf%\f'enea».iczacun _Aus 06 2012 JANHonaALv cLem<