N(j)’l‘l+;: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE, App€llamf, V. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECT()R, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appell€€, AND PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC., Appellee.

2(`)12-1484 (Reexarninatic)n N<). 95/0()(),427) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Bc)ard of Patent Appeals and Interfcrences.

INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE, INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE V. KAPPOS 2 Appellant, V. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC., Appellee.

2012-1485 (Reexamination N0. 95/000,443) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Offlce, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET n MARIE CURIE, Appellant, V. DAV`ID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC., INSTITUT PASTEU'R & UNIVERSITE V. KAPPOS Appellee.

2012- 1486 (Reexamination No. 95/000,490) Appeal from the United States Patent; and Trademark Offlce, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

INSTITUT _PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE, Appellant, V. DAV'ID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR,' UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, AND PRECISION BIOSCIENCES, INC., Appellee.

2012-1487 (Reexamination No. 95/000,491) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

INSTITUT PASTEUR & UNIVERSITE v. KAPPos 4 0N MOTION ORDER lnstitut Pasteur & UniVersite Pierre Et Marie Curie moves to consolidate appeal nos. 2012-1484, 2012-1485, 2012-1486, and 2012-1487 for briefing and argument.

Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted in part to allow consolidated briefing The parties should file consolidated briefs, with the covers of their briefs including all four captions. The cases will be treated as companion cases for purposes of oral argument, so that they will be heard by; the same merits panel on the same oral argument calendar.

FoR THE COURT

AUG 0 8 2012 /s/ Jan Horbal Date J an Horbaly ` Clerk cc: Thomas H. Jenkins, Esq.

Raymond T. Chen, Esq.

Michael J ames Twomey, Esq. 5¢\1,$!-‘03 "»a‘=s§§'§lt.s.,,, s AUG 082012 JAN HURBA|.Y CLEHK