Baldridge v. Government Printing Office
Baldridge v. Government Printing Office
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
%United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
CHRISTINE BALDRIDGE (DOING BUSINESS AS INVENTORY DISCOUNT PRINTERS), Petitioner,
V.
GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, Respondent.
2012-6001
On appeal from the Government Accountability Of- fice, Contract Appeals Board no. 11-72994»
ON MOTION
ORDER
Christine Baldridge moves the court to correct and supplement the certified list. The Government Printing Office opposes. Baldridge also moves the court to stay the case until resolution of her motion or in the alternative grant a 21-day extension of time to file her brief.
This court’s review is based upon the record of evi- dence that was before the Contract Appeals Board. See
BALDRIDGE V. GPO 2
Fed. R. App. P. 10(a)(1). Baldridge has not shown that the alleged missing documents were part of the record in the proceedings below. We cannot accept new evidence on appeal and are limited to the record before the Contract Appeals Board.
Accordingly, . IT ls ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to correct and supplement the certi- fied list is denied.
(2) The motion to stay the case is denied. The motion for an extension of time to file Baldridge’s brief is granted to the extent that her brief is due 21 days after the date of this order.
FoR THE CoURT
AUG 2 2 2012
/s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Christine Baldridge w A. Bondurant Eley, Esq. FEALS FOR 826 “AUYE%HEEERAL C\RCU\T AUG 22 2012 JAN HORBALV
CLERK
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished