U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2012

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 6, 2012
Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonpl'ecedential.

Um'ted States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plczirv,tiff-Appellant,

V.

UNITED STATES,

Defenclant-Appellee,

AND

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE

COMMISSION,

Defendant-Appellee,

AND

AMERI CAN FURNITURE MANUFACTURERS

COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL TRADE, KINCAID

FURNITURE CO., INC., L. & J.G. STICKLEY, INC., SANDBERG FURNITURE MANUFACTURING

COMPANY, INC., STANLEY FURNITURE

COMPANY, INC., T. COPELAND AND SONS, INC., AND VAUGHAN-BASSETT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.,

Defendants~flppellees.

2012-1196

ASHLEY FURNITURE V. US 2

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in consolidated case no. O'?-CV»OSZB, Judge Tirno- thy C. Stanceu_

ETHAN ALLEN GLOBAL, INC. AND ETHAN ALLEN OPERATIONS, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

V.

UNITED STATES AND UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORI)ER PROTECTION,

Defendcznts-Appellees,

AND

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Defendarz.t-Appellee,

AND

KINCAID FURNITURE CO., INC., L. & J.G.

STICKLEY, INC., SANDBERG FURNITURE

MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., STANLEY

FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., T. COPELAND AND SONS, INC., AND VAUGHAN-BASSETT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1200

Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in case 110. OS-CV-OSO.‘Z., Judge Timothy C. Stanceu.

3 ASHLEY FURNITURE v. Us

ON MOTION

Before O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

We construe the United States’ motions for extensions of time in the above-captioned appeals as inotions to stay the briefing schedules pending this court’s final disposi- tion in PS Chez Sidney L.L.C. v. United States Internct- tional Trade C'ornmission, Nos. 2008-1526, -1527, -1534. Kincaid Furniture Co., Inc., et al. (Kincaid) request the same relief in Eth,an Allen Globczl In,c. r). United States, No. 2012-1200 Appellants oppose

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT: (l) The motions are denied. (2) The government appellees in both captioned ap- peals and l{incaid shall file their response briefs within days of the date of this order. (3) All other pending motions by appellees for exten- sions of time are moot.

Foi-t Tns CoURT

3 1 ?'mz /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date J an Horbaly

Clerk cc: Joseph W. Dorn, Esq.

Jeff;»ey S. Grimson, Esq. U s CGUR§{:§]'I-:%EFEA£S_F@; Patrick V. Gallaghei-, Esq. ` `rssazntsm.czacuii Jessica R. Toplin, Esq. AUG 3 1 281’2

Craig A. Lewis, Esq.

JAN HURBN.Y

823 cusm<

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.