U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, 2012

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Decided September 6, 2012

Ashley Furniture Industries, Inc. v. United States

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonpl'ecedential.

Um'ted States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plczirv,tiff-Appellant, V. UNITED STATES, Defenclant-Appellee, AND UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee, AND AMERI CAN FURNITURE MANUFACTURERS COMMITTEE FOR LEGAL TRADE, KINCAID FURNITURE CO., INC., L. & J.G. STICKLEY, INC., SANDBERG FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., T. COPELAND AND SONS, INC., AND VAUGHAN-BASSETT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., Defendants~flppellees.

2012-1196 ASHLEY FURNITURE V. US 2 Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in consolidated case no. O'?-CV»OSZB, Judge Tirno- thy C. Stanceu_ ETHAN ALLEN GLOBAL, INC. AND ETHAN ALLEN OPERATIONS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. UNITED STATES AND UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORI)ER PROTECTION, Defendcznts-Appellees, AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Defendarz.t-Appellee, AND KINCAID FURNITURE CO., INC., L. & J.G.

STICKLEY, INC., SANDBERG FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., STANLEY FURNITURE COMPANY, INC., T. COPELAND AND SONS, INC., AND VAUGHAN-BASSETT FURNITURE COMPANY, INC. Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1200 Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in case 110. OS-CV-OSO.‘Z., Judge Timothy C. Stanceu.

3 ASHLEY FURNITURE v. Us ON MOTION Before O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R We construe the United States’ motions for extensions of time in the above-captioned appeals as inotions to stay the briefing schedules pending this court’s final disposi- tion in PS Chez Sidney L.L.C. v. United States Internct- tional Trade C'ornmission, Nos. 2008-1526, -1527, -1534.

Kincaid Furniture Co., Inc., et al. (Kincaid) request the same relief in Eth,an Allen Globczl In,c. r). United States, No. 2012-1200 Appellants oppose Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (l) The motions are denied. (2) The government appellees in both captioned ap- peals and l{incaid shall file their response briefs within days of the date of this order. (3) All other pending motions by appellees for exten- sions of time are moot.

Foi-t Tns CoURT 1 ?'mz /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Joseph W. Dorn, Esq.

Jeff;»ey S. Grimson, Esq. U s CGUR§{:§]'I-:%EFEA£S_F@; Patrick V. Gallaghei-, Esq. ` `rssazntsm.czacuii Jessica R. Toplin, Esq. AUG 3 1 281’2 Craig A. Lewis, Esq.

JAN HURBN.Y cusm<

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.