Meadwestvaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty and Closures, Inc.
Meadwestvaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty and Closures, Inc.
Opinion
Case: 12-1518 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 09/25/2012
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wntteb ~tate5 <{ourt of ~peaI5 for tbe jfeberaI <{treutt MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION AND MEADWESTVACO CALMAR, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. REXAM BEAUTY AND CLOSURES, INC. AND REXAM DISPENSING SYSTEMS S.A.S., Defendants-Appellants, AND VALOIS OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellant, AND VALOIS S.A.S., Defendant.
2012-1518, -1527
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-0511, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee.
Case: 12-1518 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 09/25/2012
MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION v. REXAM BEAUTY 2
MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION AND MEADWESTVACO CALMAR, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. REXAM BEAUTY AND CLOSURES, INC. AND REXAM DISPENSING SYSTEMS S.A.S., Defendants-Appellees, AND VALOIS OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND VALOIS S.A.S., Defendant-Appellee.
2012-1528
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in case no. 10-CV-0511, Judge Gerald Bruce Lee.
ON MOTION
ORDER Case: 12-1518 Document: 33 Page: 3 Filed: 09/25/2012
3 MEADWESTVACO CORPORATION v. REXAM BEAUTY Upon consideration of MeadWestVaco Corporation's and MeadWestVaco Calmar, Inc.'s unopposed motion to dismiss appeal no. 2012-1528, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to dismiss appeal no. 2012-1528 is granted. Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1528.
(2) The revised official caption in 2012-1518, -1527 is reflected above.
For The Court SEP 25 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Adam Phillip Samansky, Esq.
Constantine L. Trela, Jr., Esq.
Gene Stanley Winter, Esq. s26 Issued As A Mandate (as to 12-1528 only): _S_E_P_2_5_20_1_2
COURf~~i~PEALS u.s.THE FEDERAl. CIRCUITFOR SEP 25 ~U1L JAN HORBALY CLERK
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.